BioOncology Watch

Timely Information for Practicing Physicians

 

SEPTEMBER 2000

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL)

In vivo purging with chemotherapy and rituximab.  Michele Magni and coworkers investigated the ability of in vivo purging with high-dose sequential chemotherapy (HDS) alone (n=10) or HDS plus rituximab (n=15) to allow harvesting of peripheral blood progenitor cells free of contaminating tumor cells in 25 consecutive patients with CD20+ mantle cell or follicular lymphoma.  In this pilot study all patients had bone marrow involvement, polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-detectable molecular rearrangement, initial therapy with 2 or 3 cycles of standard-dose chemotherapy, treatment with nonmyeloablative high-dose chemotherapy (4-step sequence of high doses of cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, melphalan, and mitoxantrone plus melphalan) with growth factor support, and 3 progenitor cell infusions (at approximately weeks 3, 6, and 9 during high-dose chemotherapy).  Progenitor cells were harvested after high-dose cyclpohosphamide and, if necessary, following high-dose cytarabine.  Patients receiving rituximab were given 6 infusions (rituximab 375 mg/m2/infusion): 2 infusions prior to the first and second progenitor cell infusions and 2 infusions following the third progenitor cell infusion.  Progenitor cell harvests were PCR-negative for lymphoma in 14 (93%) patients in the HDS-rituximab cohort compared to 4 (40%) patients in the HDS cohort (P=.007).  Clinical and molecular remissions were achieved in all 14 (100%) evaluable patients treated with HDS and rituximab versus 7 (70%) patients treated with HDS alone.  These short-term results suggest that chemoimmunotherapy can successfully purge hematopoietic progenitor cells in vivo.  Clinical outcome benefit (relapse-free or overall survival) has not been determined.  (Magni M, et al. Blood 2000;96:864-869)

 

In vitro biologic response to rituximab.  Josee Golay and colleagues performed in vitro studies of the mechanism of action of rituximab (Roche Italia) in 4 follicular lymphoma (FL) cell lines, 1 Burkitt’s lymphoma cell line, 3 fresh FL cell samples, and normal B cells.  They found that antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and complement-mediated cytotoxicity (CDC) are the major mechanisms of antitumor activity for rituximab.  No antiproliferative or apoptotic responses to rituximab were observed in lymphoma cells.  Rituximab consistently activated ADCC in all cell lines, however the efficiency of CDC activation was variable.  Further investigation showed that complement inhibitors, especially CD55 and CD59, are regulators of CDC and that blocking antibodies to CD55 and/or CD59 increased CDC.  These in vitro findings need to be confirmed clinically as they suggest a basis for predicting clinical response to rituximab in CD20+ NHL patients.  (Golay J, et al. Blood 2000;95:3900-3908)

 

Multiple Myeloma

Effects of aminobisphosphonates on T cells.  Bisphosphonates are known to inhibit osteoclastic bone resorption and have recently been discovered to share structural homologies with gdT cell ligands.  Thus, Volkar Kunzmann et al studied the in vitro effects of several bisphosphonates on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) obtained from 6 healthy donors.  The aminobisphosphonates (pamidronate, alendronate, ibandronate) induced an expansion of gdT cells in cell cultures of these healthy-donor PBMCs (etidronate and clodronate did not have a T cell effect).  Further experiments showed that pamidronate-activated gdT cells produced cytokines and had activity against lymphoma and myeloma cell lines.  In addition pamidronate-treated bone marrow cultures derived from 24 patients with multiple myeloma showed decreased plasma cell survival.  This cytoreductive effect was abolished by gdT cell depletion.  These in vitro data indicate that aminobisphosphonates may exert an antitumor effect through activation of gdT cells.  Clinical trials are needed to confirm an aminobisphosphonate-induced antitumor activity.  (Kunzmann V, et al.  Blood 2000;96:384-392)

 

Leukemia

T-cell depletion of bone marrow transplants.  Richard Champlin and colleagues reviewed the leukemia-free survival (LFS) data from 1982-1994 for 1,868 transplant recipients with chronic myelogenous, acute myelogenous, or acute lymphoblastic leukemia reported to the International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry (IBMTR) to evaluate the different strategies of T cell depletion.  The 5-year LFS was 29% for transplants T cell depleted by narrow-specificity antibodies (n=450) compared to 16% for transplants T cell depleted by other techniques (n=420) (P<.0001).  The 5-year LFS for the non-T cell depleted transplants was 31% (n-998).  This retrospective analysis shows that T cell depletion by narrow-specificity antibodies results in higher 5-year LFS rates than that associated with other techniques, but the 5-year LFS rate is similar to that achieved with non-T cell depleted transplants despite reducing acute GVHD. (Champlin RE, et al. Blood 2000;95:3996-4003)

 

Mechanisms of resistance to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor STI571.  STI571 is an inhibitor of Bcr-Abl tyrosine kinase activity and has demonstrated activity against Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive leukemias.  However, some Ph-positive cell lines have been found to be resistant to STI571.  Francois Mahon and associates recently studied clones of Ph-positive human cell lines and murine cell lines transfected with Bcr-Abl that had been generated to be resistant to STI571.  The mechanisms of resistance were found to vary among the cell lines and included Bcr-Abl overexpression, an increased threshold for tryrosine kinase inhibition, P-glycoprotein overexpression, and possibly an acquisition of compensatory gene mutations.  These findings show that resistance to STI571 may develop through multiple mechanisms and may potentially develop in leukemic stem cells in vivo.  (Mahon FX, et al.  Blood 2000;96:1070-1079)

Return to Archive

Produced by Market Development Group through an educational grant from Genentech, Inc. and IDEC Pharmaceuticals. Comments and inquiries can be e-mailed to webmaster@biooncologywatch.org