BioOncology Watch

Timely Information for Practicing Physicians

 

JANUARY 2004

HIGHLIGHTS OF THE 45TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEMATOLOGY

DECEMBER 6-9, 2003, SAN DIEGO, CA

 

RITUXIMAB WITH CHEMOTHERAPY AND AS A SINGLE AGENT

Rituximab-CHOP (R-CHOP) in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).  Thomas Habermann et al conducted a phase III study in which 632 patients with previously untreated DLBCL were prospectively randomized to receive R-CHOP or CHOP induction chemotherapy for 2 cycles.  Responding patients (n = 415) were then randomized a second time to receive either maintenance R or observation.  With a median follow-up of 2.7 years, 540 patients were evaluable for induction therapy analyses and 348 patients were evaluable for maintenance therapy analyses. The overall response rates to R-CHOP and CHOP induction treatments were similar. Disease progression during induction was also similar between the 2 treatment groups.  The analysis of interaction between induction and maintenance led the authors to conclude that 1) induction with R-CHOP (followed by MR or observation) did significantly prolong TTF and 2) maintenance R also significantly prolonged TTF in responders induced with CHOP alone. However, no difference in overall survival has been observed to date.  In contrast, the 2-year overall survival rate was greater (77% vs. 53%) for R-CHOP- versus CHOP-treated patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL in a population-based retrospective analysis (N = 294) performed by Laurie Sehn et al in Canada. The survival advantage was observed in both < 60 and ≥ 60 age populations.  In addition, 9% of patients in the CHOP cohort had actually received R and 15% of patients in the R-CHOP cohort had not received R.  Multivariate analysis identified R treatment as an independent predictor of outcome (p = 0.002).  Further analyses are necessary to clarify survival rates in the DLBCL populations.  (Abstracts 8 and 88)

 

R-CHOP for follicular lymphoma.  Wolfgang Hiddemann and others randomized 606 patients with previously untreated follicular lymphoma to receive up to 6 cycles of either R-CHOP or CHOP alone.  R 375 mg/m2 was given i.v. on Day 1 of each cycle.  Responders to induction therapy were then treated with interferon-alfa maintenance therapy or consolidation therapy with myeloablative chemotherapy supported by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT).  Among 394 evaluable patients, the overall and complete response rates were similar for the 2 treatment groups.  However, with a median follow-up of nearly 3 years, the median TTF has not yet been reached for R-CHOP-treated patients compared to 2.6 years for CHOP-treated patients (p < 0.0007).  Toxicity was comparable between the treatment groups except for a slight increase in grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (42% vs. 37%) and allergy-like symptoms (4% vs. 0%) in R-CHOP-treated patients.  These results indicated that R-CHOP chemotherapy is associated with an improved TTF compared to CHOP alone.  (Abstract 352)

 

R-CVP in follicular lymphoma.  Robert Marcus et al performed a phase III, multicenter study in which 322 untreated patients with stage III or IV follicular NHL were randomized to receive CVP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone) alone or R-CVP. R 375 mg/m2 was infused on Day 1 of each 21-day CVP cycle.  The overall response rates were 81% and 57% in the R-CVP and CVP alone treatment groups, respectively (p < 0.0001).  Furthermore, 40% of the R-CVP-treated patients achieved a complete response compared to 10% of CVP-treated patients.  The median time to progression (TTP) had not been reached in patients treated with R-CVP while it was 13 months in those who received CVP alone (p < 0.0001).  Both treatment regimens were tolerated well.  These data demonstrate that the addition of R to CVP improves the response rate and TTP in previously untreated patients with follicular lymphoma compared to treatment with CVP alone.  (Abstract 87)

 

Rituximab (R) plus fludarabine combination therapy of untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).  The treatment of previously untreated CLL was evaluated in CALGB studies 9011 and 9712.  In CALGB 9011 patients received fludarabine monotherapy and in CALGB 9712 patients were randomized to receive fludarabine plus R concurrently or fludarabine and R sequentially.  John Byrd and associates analyzed the benefit of adding R to fludarabine therapy by comparing the outcomes of patients enrolled into CALGB 9011 (N = 179) to those of patients enrolled into CALGB 9712 (N = 104).  The analysis revealed a superior overall and complete response rate, respectively for combination R-fludarabine therapy compared to treatment with fludarabine alone. Moreover, the 2-year overall and progression-free survival rates were 93% and 67%, respectively, for R-fludarabine-treated patients compared to 81% and 45%, respectively, for single-agent fludarabine-treated patients.  This analysis suggests that the addition of R to fludarabine treatment improves clinical outcomes for patients with previously untreated CLL. Further evaluation of combination R plus fludarabine therapy is warranted. (Abstract 245)

 

Maintenance therapy vs. retreatment with rituximab (R) for patients with indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL).  John Hainsworth and colleagues randomized 90 patients with relapsed indolent NHL who had responded to standard salvage induction R treatment to receive either maintenance R therapy (375 mg/m2 weekly for 4 weeks every 6 months for 24 months) or retreatment with standard 4-week R therapy at the time of lymphoma progression.  The primary endpoint was duration of R efficacy. After a median follow-up of 41 months, the median duration of R efficacy was similar for the maintenance and retreatment groups (31 vs. 27 months).  These data indicated that the remission rate achieved with R retreatment had offset the improvement in actuarial median progression-free survival time following R induction treatment gained by maintenance R therapy (31 vs. 8 months).  More patients in the maintenance group remained in continuous remission (45% vs. 24%) and further follow-up is needed to determine if this advantage will translate into a longer duration of R efficacy for patients given maintenance therapy.  (Abstract 231)

 

RADIOIMMUNOTHERAPY (RIT)

90Y-ibritumomab for relapsed B-cell NHL following high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT.  Julie Vose et al treated 16 patients who had relapsed B-cell NHL (follicular lymphoma [7], DLBCL [7], splenic marginal zone lymphoma [1], and mantle cell lymphoma [1]) after receiving high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT with 90Y-ibritumomab (Zevalin; IDEC Corporation) in a dose-finding phase I study using the following dosing cohorts: 0.10 (n = 3); 0.15 (n = 4); and 0.20 (n = 9) mCi/kg.  The overall response rate was 45% and 3 of 6 evaluable patients treated with the 0.20 mCi/kg dose achieved a response.  Toxicities included grade 3 thrombocytopenia (4), neutropenia (2), and anemia (1). The majority of the cytopenias occurred in patients treated with the 0.20 mCi/kg dose of 90Y-ibritumomab.  This study shows that 90Y-ibritumomab therapy of patients with B-cell NHL relapsing after high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT is feasible.  A phase II trial has been initiated.  (Abstract 92)

 

NEW BIOLOGICAL APPROACHES

Novel strategies. John Leonard and colleagues presented 3 studies that outline novel approaches to the treatment of NHLs.  In one study, 13 NHL patients were retreated with a second 4-week course of epratuzumab at the time of disease progression after an initial course of single-agent epratuzumab.  They found 2 of 6 patients who had responded to the first epratuzumab course gained a response. In a second study, 25 (58%) follicular NHL and 3 (50%) CLL/SLL patients responded when epratuzumab was combined with rituximab (R) for relapsed or refractory follicular low-grade NHL.  In the third study, Genasense (GS) was tested in 45 patients with mantle cell lymphoma.  All patients started with GS monotherapy for up to 6 cycles; relapsed/refractory patients were allowed to receive an additional 6 cycles of GS and chemotherapy-naive patients without a complete response after the first 6 cycles of GS were then treated with GS plus R-CHOP for up to 6 cycles.  Among 18 evaluable relapsed/refractory patients, one achieved a complete response and 7 had stable disease. In chemotherapy-naive patients, there were 5 stable diseases and 8 progressive diseases. In 8 evaluable patients who received GS plus R-CHOP, there were 2 complete and 4 partial responses and 2 stable diseases.  These novel approaches warrant further study.  (Abstracts 233, 490, and 2375)

 

New monoclonal antibody therapies.  Several new monoclonal antibodies are undergoing evaluation.  John Byrd et al reported interim results from a phase I study of an anti-CD23 monoclonal antibody (lumiliximab; IDEC Pharmaceuticals) in patients with relapsed or refractory CLL.  Lumiliximab was tolerated well and clinical activity was noted.  Rhona Stein and others reviewed the preclinical evaluation of an anti-CD74 monoclonal antibody (LL1; Immunomedics, Inc.) as a potential therapy against B-cell malignancies.  LL1 is taken up by lysosomes and may be an effective means to deliver antitumor agents.  A fully human anti-CD30 monoclonal antibody (MDX-060; Medarex, Inc.) has been evaluated in a phase I/II study of patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's Disease or anaplastic large cell lymphoma by Stephen Ansell and colleagues.  Minimal toxicity was encountered and activity was observed in one patient.  Myron Czuczman et al. tested an anti-CD80 monoclonal antibody (galiximab; IDEC Pharmaceuticals) in a multicenter phase I/II trial in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma.  No dose-limiting toxicities were experienced and responses were observed in all treatment groups. (Abstracts 248, 630, 632, and 2393)

 

VACCINE THERAPY

Use in patients with mantle-cell lymphoma (MCL).  John Leonard and co-workers evaluated a personalized Id vaccine consisting of a recombinant Id protein conjugated to Keyhole Limpet Hemocyanin (KLH) administered with GM-CSF in 27 patients with MCL following CHOP chemotherapy.  Anti-idiotype immune responses were observed and among 11 MCL patients, median time to progression had not been reached with a median follow-up of 522 days after the completion of CHOP.  In a second study, Wyndham Wilson and colleagues evaluated an Id-vaccine given to 25 MCL patients following completion of rituximab (R)-containing chemotherapy (EPOCH-R).  Patients received Id-KLH/GM-CSF x 5 over 6 months and at 24 months median follow-up, the event-free and overall survival rates were 50% and 100%, respectively.  These studies show that an Id-vaccination therapeutic approach may potentially improve time to disease progression following chemotherapy for aggressive lymphoma.  (Abstracts 357 and 358)

 

MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES (MDS)

CC-5013 treatment of MDS-associated anemia.  Alan List and colleagues investigated the use of CC-5013 (Celgene, Inc.), a novel oral immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) in a single-center study of MDS patients with red blood cell (RBC) transfusion-dependent (≥ 4 units/8 weeks) or symptomatic anemia (hemoglobin [Hgb] <9 g/dL).  Among 33 evaluable patients, 26 patients had failed prior erythropoietin therapy and 17 patients had failed prior thalidomide treatment.  Twenty-one patients experienced an erythroid response during CC-5013 therapy and 19 patients had a major erythroid response (RBC transfusion independence or a > 2 g/dL Hgb increase).  The responses have been durable as the median time to treatment failure had not been reached.  Responses were associated with an increased bone marrow apoptotic index and near complete suppression of bone marrow plasma VEGF.  Grade 3 or 4 marrow suppression was dose-dependent and was the most common adverse event.  Grade 1 or 2 toxicities included scalp pruritus (10), diarrhea (9), urticaria (3), and hypothyroidism (2).  These data indicate that CC-5013 has erythropoietic and cytogenetic remitting activity in patients with MDS and warrant further study.  (Abstract 641)

Return to Archive

Produced by Market Development Group through an educational grant from Genentech, Inc. and IDEC Pharmaceuticals. Comments and inquiries can be e-mailed to webmaster@biooncologywatch.org